Reader or writer (and
hopefully, the latter makes you both, since a writer who doesn’t read is, frankly,not doing the job properly), we consume books and often want to share our
opinions on them. So, we review. Many sites where reviews appear use a star
system to grade them. I’m not going to list them all, but I’ll use three of the
most popular as examples and try to gain a feeling for what reviewers might
understand by these gradings.
We all know that 5 star
reviews are considered the pinnacle from the point of view of the writer
assessing success or otherwise, and thought of as a damn good guide to
readability by readers. So, the grading is quite important to all of us. But
what does it mean?
If you hover over the
stars on Goodreads, you’ll get the following results:
1* Did not like it,
2* It
was OK,
3* Liked it,
4* Really liked it,
5* It was amazing.
Do the same for Amazon and
you get these results:
1* I hate it,
2* I don’t like it,
3* It’s okay,
4* I
like it,
5* I love it.
With Smashwords, hovering
over the stars produces no response and I can find no definitions at all on the
site (that’s not to say they don’t exist, of course, just that I can’t discover
them!).
So, there’s no consistency
in the systems. 4 stars can mean ‘I like it’ or ‘I really like it’ or whatever
the reviewer considers is the hidden meaning of the Smashwords stars.
Similarly, if a book is ‘okay’, then it could be awarded 2, 3 or 1-5 stars
depending which system in use. And, I don’t know about you, but I can ‘love’ a
book without necessarily considering it to be ‘amazing’.
My point? This system is
used by readers to gauge the potential readability of a book. I’m certain that
many readers won’t get beyond that * award, making their decisions whether or
not to read/buy, based entirely on this rather arbitrary symbol.
The tool isn’t up to the
purpose for which it was introduced. Perhaps, as readers, and writers, we
should get together and demand that the different sites conform to a uniform
system so that everybody knows exactly what is actually meant by these symbols.
Or perhaps you like the variations. Either way, I’d love to know what you
think.
No comments:
Post a Comment