Google+
This blog has moved. Please go over to this link to see my new website.
Showing posts with label Reading (process). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reading (process). Show all posts

Sunday, 12 October 2014

#BookADayUK; A Reader Event For October. Day 12

Today's a short one. The event for today is 'Favourite bookseller recommendation'. I've never been in the position where I've had to seek out new titles to read. Usually, I've had more books on the 'to read' list than I have time to get to. At present, the list is 151 titles long, and these are books that are either print volumes on my shelves at home, or in digital form on my iPad. So, I don't think I need any recommendations to grow that list, eh?

Sunday, 1 June 2014

The Month of May(be)?

May; month of fertility rites and, in UK we hope, sunshine at last. Well, we had a couple of Bank Holidays and the weather, a topic of supreme interest in these islands, proved reasonable for one of those. 50% can’t be bad.

As for me; I’ve spent much of the month doing the read-aloud edit of the last two books in the fantasy trilogy, ASeared Sky. As many of you will know, the first book, Joinings, was published by Fantastic Books Publishing at the end of March. It continues to sell and attract interest and 5 star reviews. In response to remarks in a couple of reviews and from other readers, relating to the character names, I’ve produced a couple of lists of the players and the names used in myth and legend. Dan, my publisher, converted these to PDF docs. If you’d like to download or print them, you’ll find the players’ list here and the myth and legends list here. These are now included in the books for those who buy from now. I want my readers to be certain that they’ll have an opportunity to read the entire trilogy, so I’ve been completing the series by doing the final edit as a read-aloud from a printed script. That entails reading 868 A4 pages of print. Book two is now ready for the publisher. Book three is written and I’m a third of the way through the final edit of that volume.

All that reading aloud has meant I’ve had a diminished taste for other reading, unfortunately. And I’ve a couple of books I really must read and review, so they’re next on the list.

The Sci-Fi novelette that’s anxious to escape from the back of my mind is now really pushing, but it’ll have to wait a little longer before I release it onto the page.

The month has been domestically quite busy, with my daughter returning home from her 3 years at university, her final exhibition, and all the things associated with such effort on behalf of a talented offspring.

I’ve written 17 blog posts, read and reviewed 2 books and penned a dozen poems during the month, as well as partaking in a few online discussions, some continuing on a guest post I did at the end of April on a great site, Writers’ Village, and others on a smashing site I’ve also contributed to in the past, The Blood Red Pencil. I’ve updated the list of my writing successes and posted that as a table at the foot of the Published Works page here on the blog, for those who are interested, click here to take you that page. I’ve also answered questions for an interview on a fantasy website, which should appear some time at the beginning of this month. So, whilst I haven’t created as much as I would have liked, I’ve been pretty busy with writing stuff. How’s your month gone?

The chart, explained:
Writing - initial creation of stories, blog posts, reviews and longer works.
Editing - polishing of all written work to make it suitable for readers.
Research - discovery of info for story content, market research, contests and blog posts.
Reading - books and writing magazines.
Networking - emails, Twitter, Pinterest, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+, and comments.

Admin - story submission, blog posting, marketing, organisation, tax, and general admin tasks.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 16 March 2014

The Bull at the Gate, by Linda Acaster, Reviewed

The Bull at the Gate, by Linda Acaster, is the second in the Torc of Moonlight trilogy of occult romantic thrillers. I read the first and have been waiting for this second with some impatience. It was worth the wait.

Linda Acaster is a writer with talent. That she’s done research in depth for this book is clear. The detail, especially of the archaeology and history of York, is superb. I thought I knew the city, but I’ve learned things I never even suspected. York is, in fact, another character in the book.

The story is complex; an intertwining of present day events with those occurring in Roman York. And, ever-present, the raison d’ĂȘtre of hero Nick’s every move, is the enigmatic and mysterious entity that may or may not be Alice. The past returns to haunt Nick, literally, as he struggles to recover from the devastation of loss that occurred earlier in his life. To complicate matters, a new woman emerges uninvited into his life. Sophie is clearly a girl intent on a good time and, when she goes missing, her association with Nick places him in the field as a prime suspect with the local police.

Are Nick’s experiences real, imaginary, glimpses of another world and time, or the product of a damaged mind struggling with a past event too difficult to face? In weaving the tale, Linda Acaster keeps the reader guessing, providing clues but muddying the waters with an unreliable narrator.

Is this book crime, romance, historical, occult, or is it both a combination of these and something else entirely? And does it matter that it crosses genres? As a reader, such classification isn’t important to me. What matters is a gripping tale populated by characters I can empathise with and others I can thoroughly dislike. And this book provides exactly that. Had my circumstances been different, I would have read this at one sitting. As it was, I found myself eager to read it whenever time and opportunity allowed. I was driven to reach the end, to discover what would happen.

As with the first book in the series, this is a well-told tale with real depth and multiple themes explored in a unique style. And, as expected of a work of intelligence, it makes demands of the reader. There are several WTF? moments, times when the reader has to pause to consider, times when questions arise unanswered only to be clarified later in the story. I like that. Reading is far from a passive activity and Linda Acaster’s writing brings the occupation to life in a unique way.


I enjoyed the read and have no hesitation in recommending the book. And, let’s have the final book as soon as possible!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 9 January 2014

Starring the Reviews

Reader or writer (and hopefully, the latter makes you both, since a writer who doesn’t read is, frankly,not doing the job properly), we consume books and often want to share our opinions on them. So, we review. Many sites where reviews appear use a star system to grade them. I’m not going to list them all, but I’ll use three of the most popular as examples and try to gain a feeling for what reviewers might understand by these gradings.

We all know that 5 star reviews are considered the pinnacle from the point of view of the writer assessing success or otherwise, and thought of as a damn good guide to readability by readers. So, the grading is quite important to all of us. But what does it mean?

If you hover over the stars on Goodreads, you’ll get the following results: 
1* Did not like it, 
2* It was OK, 
3* Liked it, 
4* Really liked it, 
5* It was amazing.

Do the same for Amazon and you get these results: 
1* I hate it, 
2* I don’t like it, 
3* It’s okay, 
4* I like it, 
5* I love it.

With Smashwords, hovering over the stars produces no response and I can find no definitions at all on the site (that’s not to say they don’t exist, of course, just that I can’t discover them!).

So, there’s no consistency in the systems. 4 stars can mean ‘I like it’ or ‘I really like it’ or whatever the reviewer considers is the hidden meaning of the Smashwords stars. Similarly, if a book is ‘okay’, then it could be awarded 2, 3 or 1-5 stars depending which system in use. And, I don’t know about you, but I can ‘love’ a book without necessarily considering it to be ‘amazing’.

My point? This system is used by readers to gauge the potential readability of a book. I’m certain that many readers won’t get beyond that * award, making their decisions whether or not to read/buy, based entirely on this rather arbitrary symbol.


The tool isn’t up to the purpose for which it was introduced. Perhaps, as readers, and writers, we should get together and demand that the different sites conform to a uniform system so that everybody knows exactly what is actually meant by these symbols. Or perhaps you like the variations. Either way, I’d love to know what you think.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 7 June 2013

Excellent Women, by Barbara Pym, Reviewed.

I read the Folio Society edition of this novel, illustrated rather charmingly and with considerable insight, by Debra McFarlane. There’s something essentially apt about reading a book from the early 50s in the form of a hardback with appropriate plates. Set in the period just following World War II, and written in the first person by one of the ‘excellent women’ of the title, it should really be entirely of its time. The simple brilliance of the writing, the wonderful characterisation and the gently comic surface of a story bursting with subterranean passion, angst, desperation and injustice elevates the novel to the status of a minor classic.

There’s no violence, no sex, no foul language; yet all of humanity is here amongst the weary, caring, superficial, flirting, thoughtless, considerate, courageous, resigned and loving people that inhabit the pages. Church, though neither spirituality nor real faith, plays a significant part in the lives of the protagonists who attend the edifice but appear devoid of any passion for their religion, frequently gently mocking their membership of the club.

Miss Mildred Lathbury, who describes herself in the fourth paragraph of the first chapter as an unmarried clergyman’s daughter just over thirty and living alone without apparent ties, is far from the dull spinster we might expect. The gentle humour that suffuses the whole book often hides a deep pathos as the excellent women of the title go about their daily lives without hope of fulfilment in marriage, career or society in general. Being busy, showing and dealing with concern for their fellow human beings, whilst living grey, unnoticed lives, these are the women who make life easier, sometimes even possible, for those surrounding them.

The unexpressed intelligence, the unacknowledged charity, the unspoken desire, the unrecognised hopes and dreams of these single women is so exquisitely drawn that the reader feels every nuance of the subtle insults that surround them. Taken for granted, patronised, ignored, relied upon and rejected without thought, these women take on all those tasks that others find either boring or irrelevant until the jobs are neglected; only then are the quiet duties seen for the social glue they truly are, but not for very long, of course.

The society in which this novel takes place has largely disappeared, but the people and the circumstances remain. I laughed out loud many times whilst reading the book but always, under the surface, was a recognition that the humour sprang from deep inequalities of both gender and income. I was reminded of the best of British sitcoms where humour is mingled with pathos, each quality emphasising the other in a balance that works so well to entertain whilst putting across a message.


This is a story in which nothing of any significance to anyone outside the narrow confines of the small neighbourhood takes place. There are no earth-shattering events, no crime, nothing crude, nothing erotic. But it depicts lives lived in quiet, courageous desperation and does so with a deep affection for those described. I enjoyed it, and I suspect Mildred will live with me for a long time. Those who enjoy action and adventure will find this hard to read, but I thoroughly recommend it to all those who love romance in its best form, those who enjoy books with real characters, and those who find enjoyment in gentle humour.
Enhanced by Zemanta