Google+
This blog has moved. Please go over to this link to see my new website.

Wednesday 30 April 2014

The Trespasser, by D.H. Lawrence, Reviewed

D.H.Lawrence’s The Trespasser, published, after The White Peacock, in 1912 is very much of its time. Unlike the more famous Lady Chatterley’s Lover, this is a book that might excite the interest of a modern publisher but wouldn’t be actually published. The language, full of deeply poetic angst, is identifiably old fashioned, and the plot is so thin, and no longer in any form unique, that no current editor could consider publication.

We live in a different age and few these days would have the patience to read this piece of literature in the way necessary to absorb fully the subtlety of the nuanced language. As a step back into an earlier time, when readers were prepared to mull over the words and ideas presented by an author, it did an excellent job for me. But, I admit, there were descriptive passages I skipped, wanting to get back to the emotional conflicts and leave the landscape to my imagination.

Lawrence has a way of employing language in ways that most writers wouldn’t dare, and he not only gets away with it, but produces evocative and moving prose. If the story is thin, the characters most certainly are not. This is a book all about character in its literal and metaphorical senses. Modern readers, by which I mean those young enough to remain unaware of the furore over Lady C (which I read in my late teens, when it was finally released in UK), are unlikely to understand the moral dilemma at the heart of the novel. When the idea of faithfulness in marriage has been as widely disparaged as it has in modern literature, it must be hard to comprehend why anyone would put themselves through the torture here described simply in order to satisfy the whim of then current social and religious mores.


I’d like to report that I enjoyed the book, but it is a work more to be endured, whilst the empathetic reader is compelled to discover an outcome that is, in reality, inevitable. Those interested in Lawrence, studying literature, or fascinated by portrayals of English life at the beginning of the last century will find a great deal here. For the rest, I suspect the archaic language and the lack of a modern plot will prevent any real enjoyment.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday 29 April 2014

Do You Employ Redundancy? #3

A further foray into fascinating fixations with unwarranted words, repetitions and similar scandalous sins of syntax. If guilty, you’re sentenced to serious sessions roasting over the flames of Fowler’s Modern English Usage!

Actual fact: A fact is something real, something actual, as opposed to something imaginary. ‘Actual’ is an unnecessary spare part.

Came at a time when: If something happens when it happens, it occurs at the time of occurrence. The phrase ‘at a time’ is tautology and should be rejected.

Direct confrontation: When you confront something, you tackle it head-on, and you can’t get any more direct than that, so cut it out.

Enter in: To enter is to go in. Chuck out ‘in’.

First began: The beginning is when something first comes to be. ‘First’ is as extraneous as a third foot (unless you’re a tripod).

Major breakthrough: Interesting, this one. In most cases, a breakthrough suggests significant progress. ‘Major’ isn’t exactly redundant, but the meaning of ‘breakthrough’ is implicit. However, it is possible to have a ‘minor breakthrough’, where such an event is a useful step on a journey toward a specific goal.

Postpone until later: You postpone an event by putting it off until later. Enough said.

Repeat again: If you repeat an action or a piece of text, you do it again. No further explanation required.

Since the time whenSince indicates that time has passed. ‘The time when’ just adds extra words, contributing nothing to the meaning.

Unexpected surprise: Surprise, surprise! Ooh, that was unexpected. Need I say more?


Another rant expressed. But there will be more!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday 25 April 2014

Guest Posting on Writers Village - Killing Characters.

John Yeoman's Logo - I love it!
Just a quickie to let you know I'm guesting on that great site, Writers' Village. A piece about killing off
your characters. Have a gander and join in the chat. We all need to do our players to death sometimes. How's it go for you?

Click this link to read the piece.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday 24 April 2014

Exploring Character and Place: #1

I’m doing a series of pieces on the characters and places featured in my latest release. This will be background information, not covered in the book, but intended to enhance the reading experience. 

For some of my people, there’ll be a character drawing, supplied by Alice Taylor, maybe a video interview, and accompanying scripts. I may include a short piece of fiction, deepening the knowledge of certain minor characters as well.

For the places, I’ll incorporate sections of the map, to indicate location, along with a description of the place, as I see it, and, where appropriate, linking it with characters. I’m not intending to reveal any of the story, either as already published or as written into the series, merely to enhance the reader’s enjoyment of the trilogy by providing more information. 

I hope this will give pleasure to those who’ve bought the book and, perhaps, persuade others to take that step (the digital version is only the price of a large cappuccino, and the print version costs less than a reasonable restaurant meal for one, but it’ll give you hours more enjoyment and won’t expand your waistline.)

Some pronunciation hints:
Aklon-Dji: think of the ‘Dj’ sound in the name of tennis champion, Novak Djokovic.
Shoarhn: show-arhn.
Aglydron: aglih-dron.
Ytraa: it-rah.
Mind you, these are just my take on the names, how I hear them in my head. You may pronounce them any way you wish; reading is, after all, an active rather than a passive occupation.

Dji is a title, which means ‘the son of’ and refers only to high-ranking members of the priesthood. It is reserved for those offspring acknowledged by the priest/priestess as his or her own child. Aklon-Dji is a major protagonist in the trilogy and is introduced here by Shoarhn, one of the many women who loves him.

SA:                  So, Shoarhn, how would you describe Aklon-Dji?

Shoarhn:          Beautiful! He’s younger than me, but not by much. His eyes; they’re amazing. Deep blue and flecked with tiny specks of gold. He’s well built, which suits me as his lover.

SA:                  Aren’t you a married to another man, though?

Shoarhn:          Aglydron cares more about ceremony and rite than he does about me. I don’t know why he didn’t just take a temple slave and join with her for Ytraa. He certainly doesn’t care whether I’m pleased when we join. Not like Aklon; he cares deeply for women.

SA:                  Not jealous of his philandering?

Shoarhn:          Why would I be? Ytraa commands us to join when we can, in worship of Ytraa. But I admit I’d love to have Aklon all to myself.

SA:                  Tell me more about this man.

Shoarhn:          Aklon’s about 30 years old, very tall, with long dark auburn hair. He’s broad-shouldered and strong. His father, the High Priest, Dagla Kaz, disinherited him because Aklon insists on telling the truth. When he learned the buried secrets of the Followers, he was so enraged that he rejected his past. He was made Renegade by his father. There’s a price on his head and he lives precariously, befriending converts to his way of thinking. A growing group of these faithful supporters, called the Few, made up mostly of women, and some of their men, ensure he’s always fed and sheltered.
He has a short full beard, and his olive skin bears many small scars from numerous fights and brave exploits. He’s almost as fanatical about his alternative to the religion, which he calls the Cause, as his father is about the Followers.
Unusually for a man of his age, he’s single, but that’s because the role of the High Priest, which he’d have inherited on the death of his father, is an uninhibited one with no single woman taken as a life-partner.
Aklon loves women, sexually and as companions he can talk to about the things that matter most to him. He cares about justice, equality and truth. Even though he’s trained as a soldier, he hates unnecessary violence.

SA:                  Sounds like a great guy. He must have his faults, though, surely?

Shoarhn:          He’s a man. Of course he has faults. Like the way he insists on speaking very precisely. Can be a bit annoying, to be honest. And he wears the best quality clothes he can, in spite of being on the run. People say he’s vain, but really he’s just trying to keep himself civilised whilst he’s hunted. He enjoys too many women for my liking, but, like I say, that’s what we’re supposed to do. Mind you, he says he doesn’t believe in the ways of the Followers now, so maybe he should be changing his habits. Look, I love him. You can’t expect me to give an unbiased view, can you?

SA:                  I suppose not, Shoarhn. But thank you for this insight. How did you meet him, by the way, if he’s a wanted man?

Shoarhn:          He came to me with information about Aglydron and Okkyntalah, my daughter’s betrothed, when they went missing after the Choosing. He cares about us, you see.


Video interview with Shoarhn:

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday 23 April 2014

Writers’ Earnings

English: J. K. Rowling, after receiving an hon...
English: J. K. Rowling, after receiving an honorary degree from The University of Aberdeen (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I was recently tempted to make a comment on a discussion forum relating to the earnings of writers and it prompted me to write this post. 

There’s a great deal of inflated expectation from new writers, or those who wish to become professional writers. Many members of the public have grossly exaggerated ideas of author’s earnings, largely driven by headlines concerning such popular figures as JK Rowling and others. If you’re a new writer and you hope to make a living at the craft, please think very carefully about what you’re going to do. It’s true that some writers make a fortune, but the vast majority earn insufficient to make a living.

One way of ensuring a living wage is to become an employee working for a recognised organisation, of course. Journalism is considered a great background for many forms of writing, for example. Look into real job prospects, explore the reality of wages. But, please, don’t give up the day job and set about penning your wonder novel without understand the facts about writers’ earnings. So that you can do that more fully, I’ve attached a few links to recent features below.


Please read these BEFORE you go and tell your boss what he can do with his ******* job, won’t you?


There are more, if you do the usual Google search (or any other useful search engine) but this should give you enough to make you consider your options. Good luck if you decide to go ahead.

Of course, if you're a real writer, you'll write anyway: it's a compulsion for those of us with the disease and we're unable to ignore it, regardless of wealth or poverty. We do it because it's who we are.
Enhanced by Zemanta